 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 2007
Elsewhere on the WebVictor Davis Hanson’s Private Papers Victor Davis Hanson Archive on National Review OnlineTour Books
A War Like No Other How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War
by Victor Hanson
Amazon.com’s Best of 2001 Many theories have been offered regarding why Western culture has spread so successfully across the world, with arguments ranging from genetics to superior technology to the creation of enlightened economic, moral, and political systems. In Carnage and Culture, military historian Victor Hanson takes all of these factors into account in making a bold, and sure to be controversial, argument: Westerners are more effective killers.
by Victor Davis Hanson
by Victor Davis Hanson
by Victor Davis Hanson
by Victor Davis Hanson, John Keegan Hanson, for those who somehow have missed him until now, is a professor of Classics at California State and also is a part time farmer, both of which have contributed to his writing as a military historian. As a classicist, Hanson is well versed in the sources in their original Greek, and as a farmer he understands how agriculture affected the experience of the Greeks at war.
by Victor Davis Hanson
by Victor Davis Hanson
Hanson relates the life stories of his farmer neighbors, writing that their way of life will likely soon disappear, thanks in part to a federal system of agricultural subsidies that favors large-scale, industrial farm corporations over individual “yeomen.” This is a sobering and eye-opening book. by Victor Davis Hanson On first glance, The Soul of Battle appears to be three different books: biographies of two well-known generals—Sherman and Patton—and one who is virtually unknown today, the ancient Greek leader Epaminondas. Yet Victor Davis Hanson, a classics professor and author of The Western Way of War, makes a compelling connection between these three men. They were “eccentrics, considered unbalanced or worse by their own superiors” who led democratic armies on missions of freedom.
by Robert B. Strassler (Editor), Victor Davis Hanson (Introduction)
|
October 6, 2007 4:36 AM
Observations about the warLast week’s quiet I just returned to Kuwait, and have been in Iraq visiting forward operating bases in Anbar and Diyala provinces, as well as suburbs of Baghdad the last week, hence the recent silence on this blog given sporadic internet facilities in Iraq. I hope to post a series of observations. But for now here are a few initials impressions from my second visit to the country. (Please excuse the typos, writing in haste from Kuwait City) Almost all the Marines and Army units I visited from Ramadi to Taji to various hot spots in Baghdad and Diyala believe there has been a sudden shift in the pulse of battlefield. Sometimes without much warning thousands of once disgruntled Sunni have turned on al Qaeda, ceased resistance, and are flocking to join government security forces and begging the Americans to stop both al Qaeda and Shiite militias. Commanders in the field are cautious. They know that if the Shiite dominated government in Baghdad stays vengeful for decades of past suffering at the hands of Sunni Baathists, the reconciliation will fail. So thousands of American officers are desperately pressuring ministries to start distributing the vast wealth of Iraq’s $80 a barrel oil revenues to Anbar and Diyala before the Sunni revert back to insurgency. The U.S. military The brilliance of U.S. army and marines officers has not been fully appreciated. I met scores with PhDs and MAs, from Majors to Colonels, who are literally all at once trying to defeat al Qaeda gangs and Shiite militias, rebuild government facilities, arbitrate tribal feuds, repair utilities and train Iraqi army and police. As was true of the last trip to Iraq, I am left with three general impressions about the military. (1) Our army and marines are far too few and overextended. The United States must either radically increase the size of these traditional ground units or scale back its commitments in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. (2) There is more optimism about success among the battlefield soldiers than present with analysts in Baghdad. The sudden decrease in violence has left many units stunned that Iraqis who used to try to kill them are suddenly volunteering information about terrorists and landmines, and clamoring to join the joint security force. Usually those behind the desk are the optimists, the soldiers who die the pessimists. But instead there is genuine feeling on the front that after four frustrating years of ordeal, at last there are tangible signs of real, often radical improvement. (3) As a supporter of some four years of the now unpopular effort to remove Saddam and leave a democracy in his place, I continue to have only one reservation, albeit a major one. The U.S. soldier in the field is so unusually competent and heroic that one comes to despair at the very thought of losing even one of them. As a military historian I know that an army that can’t take casualties can’t win, but I confess after spending 16-hour days with our soldiers in impossible conditions one wonders whether the entire country of Iraq is worth the loss of just of these unusual Americans. I understand both the lack of logic and perhaps amorality in such a sweeping statement, but feel it nonetheless out here. The complexity of the effort The military is pulling out all the stops. Some examples. They have flown Vietnam-era veterans to lecture on counter-insurgency in their school at Taji, in addition to clinic psychologists and veterans of recent wars from Panama to Afghanistan. The problem is now not too few interpreters, but too many trying to join us. Some of the best are Iraqi-Americans, who know American idiom and deeply appreciate being an American. Hundreds are working on IEDs, not just counter-technologies and aerial surveillance, but sophisticated methods of learning how they are made, how the bombers function, and how they are paid and maintained. Thousands of other reserve and retired engineers have come to Iraq to build and advise Iraqi contractors. I met a fascinating engineer in his mid-fifties who volunteered to return to the Marines and is now supervising the reconstruction of the governmental center in Ramadi. Again, they are trying not just to defeat the insurgency, but to literally take Iraq from its primordial past to the twenty-first century within four years. A Herculean Task. Mythologies A common slur is that Halliburton is looting the treasury and contractors in Iraq are greedy profiteers. I again found the opposite to be true. Thousands of construction personnel build bases, road, and Iraqi facilities, sometimes under fire, but living with the notion of shelling or shooting any minute. I consider them more likely under- rather than overpaid. Iraq is not a poor country. Flying over the Tigris-Euphrates valley (I speak now a farmer) is unlike anything in Kuwait or Saudi Arabia. The soil is rich, the water plentiful and the dry climate perfect for intensive agriculture. That the country in theory within a year or two could pump well over three million barrels of petroleum a day, gives some indication of just how badly Iraq has been run the last forty years to screw up such natural bounty of a country—the Baathist-terror state, the attack on Iran, the massacres of Kurdish and Shiite innocents, the 1991 Gulf War, the no-fly zones and UN embargo, et al. Next posting… Hope to leave Kuwait tonight and post more on Iraq—some thoughts on our chances of winning, the nature of our colonels in the field, an interview with General Petraeus, the real Al Qaeda (or what Sunnis who once joined them now say about them) and other observations. .. Again, excuse the typos, since I write in haste. Postscript Hope to post tomorrow. One final thought. I must emphasize that we as a country have to support those in the field of fire. They believe not just that we can win by securing Iraq, but that they are doing a moral good by giving millions a chance of something quite different. Whatever one’s views on the war are, it seems to me morally reprehensible that anyone would slander an American soldier, whether comparing them to terrorists or their General to a betrayer. We have a very rare precious resource in today’s military that really does represent the moral upper crust of American society, and as long as it is engaged, we need to support it. We may come to the day that the military itself thinks victory is beyond our resources or not worth the cost, but from what I saw this week, as in 2006, we are not there at that day yet by a long shot.
Comments (49)TBranin :Allison Aller :Thank you so much for bringing your eyes, ears, and mind to the situation in Iraq and reporting back to us. Very, very much appreciated. David Thomson :"So thousands of American officers are desperately..." These officers should also contact their relatives and friends to put pressure on the self-hating Americans within the Democratic Party and their Ron Paul Republican allies who are jeopardizing their mission in Iraq. Democrats especially cannot effectively fight the war on terror and the thugs in Iraq because of their existential unease dealing with racial issues. The fact that our enemies in the Middle East are rarely blue eyed and blond haired discombobulates them. This factor may be more important then their ingrained dishonest pacifism. a Duoist :Stateside, several recent news stories and interviews with Iraqis reveal an inability of the Iraqi government to spend their oil funds on local projects. Corruption does not seem to be the inhibiting problem; there is simply no civil infrastructure to build physical infrastructure. Related: Where is entrepreneurism in Iraq? If the oil funds are not invested in capital stock, the Arabs of Iraq will become like the Arabs of Wahhab-Saudi Arabia: resource rich, but indolent; eventually, broke. SoCal Pir8 :Finally, an analysis I can trust. jdg :What is the best way for America to increase the number of soldiers without jeopardizing the quality of our military? Stephen Rittenberg :Thank you Professor Hanson. The fantasy of a unified Iraq is NOT worth the life of one of the great young Americans you met. However, removing the threat posed by Saddam was wise. The task of bringing death cult savages from the 8th century into the 21st is utopian and has not been worth the huge costs. Paul Lynch :I truly appreciate your trenchant observations and articulate conclusions. I am from a diferent generation perhaps - I did like your postscript, but feel "moral upper crust" must be replaecd by "moral backbone". Thank you for your insight. Papa Ray :VDH, it makes my day to hear you praise our American Military. I only wish that I had read or heard such, forty some odd years ago. It might have changed my life and those around me. If you have a young warrior tell you something in the heat of the battle, you can take it to the bank, because he ain't gonna bullsh!t you or himself at that time. Not saying he would later, but I've been there and know from what I speak. Looking forward to your future dispatches. Take care and remember, that today is the day that you need to savor, because tomorrow may never come. Papa Ray buddy larsen :''...the moral upper crust of American society'' Damn, somebody finally SAID it. Amen.
golfmann
|
Pajamas MediaEthically Speaking: Should You Vacation in Burma? Critics Miss Benefits of ‘No Child Left Behind’ The Singing Revolution Against the Evil Empire How Iran Is Killing U.S. Troops in Iraq Backlash Against Media Smears in the Heartland Golden State Gay Marriage Ban Struck Down McCain’s Vision of America in 2013 Dueling Steves: Steve Schmidt [VIDEO]
Support Pajamas Media; Visit Our Advertisers
Support Pajamas Media; Visit Our Advertisers
RSS FeedsADVERTISEMENT
|
digg this
del.icio.us![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://pajamasmedia.com/xpress/victordavishanson/nav-commenters.gif)
Love ya, Doc!
I hang on your every word because I know of no one else anywhere who knows as much and gives the unvarnished.
Oct 6, 2007 07:42 AM